Posts

This week, I focused on the many aspects of PWAs and their role in making the web experience more streamlined across browsers and devices. Inherent to PWAs is the concept of progressive enhancement. To the untrained eye, progressive enhancement might seem akin to the concept of “it works without JavaScript”. While this is kinda sorta true (a well built PWA should work with JS turned off 🤞🏾), progressive enhancement is more about using web technologies in a so-called “layered” fashion. This technique of building apps makes them adaptable and allows them to run seamlessly regardless of bandwidth, network connectivity or software. In short, Progressive Enhancement is the deliberate strategy of building apps on the foundation of making it usable everywhere. ...

In the latest stable build of Chrome, came support for desktop progressive web apps (PWAs). Similar to mobile PWAs, desktop PWAs allow users to install apps onto a device’s home screen for quick and easy access. In addition to this, they allow web apps leverage to the numerous capabilities of modern web APIs like authentication, payments and so on, without having to worry about potential security vulnerabilities. After all, a desktop PWA is basically a web browser running in its own app window context. ...

Push notifications are a simple way in which web applications can interact with users to provide them with timely updates and customized content. When integrated with service workers, push notifications allow web applications a more active and engaging experience that was previously reserved for mobile applications. Technically speaking, this feature is possible thanks to the Push API. The Push API is what allows web applications to receive messages from the server, regardless of whether an application or a user agent is active. This API effectively gives developers control over delivering asynchronous notifications and updates to users who have opted in. In theory—if done right—push notifications allow for higher engagement. However, most of the time push notifications are disruptive to user experience. In a sense, push notifications have come to represent the web equivalent of that annoying sales person who hovers over your shoulder as you browse. Even browsers—I see you firefox—have taken to rolling out user settings so you can disable push notifications completely. With this poor sentiment around push, how can we effectively leverage them without being an annoyance to users? ...

Service workers are an important player in the PWA game. Not only are they handy for keeping applications functional while offline, they are also instrumental when it comes to improving overall page load time. Working with a service worker however can be a little tricky. Because they are run in the background of a page (outside of a page’s render cycle) and are registered only once, service workers don’t always work as expected. Contrary to how we normally build and debug for the web, service workers don’t update when the file is updated and the page is refreshed. Depending on your use case, reflecting changes made to a service worker may require either closing the browser tab, refreshing the page or navigating to another page. The reason for this behavior is that the service workers are bound to a specific lifecycle that predetermines whether and how they gain control of the document. The lifecycle of a service worker can be one of the most confusing if not frustrating aspects of working with a service worker. Even so, understanding this lifecycle is the key to unlocking the possibilities that service workers provide. ...

Offline storage is the linchpin of progressive enhancement. Under a low or unreliable network connection, the app is not dependent on a successful response from the server to be operational. Instead, it reads and writes data from a local in browser database while in offline mode. There are several ways to serve data offline. Picking the right option for your PWA ultimately depends on the type of data you’re intending to store and how big it is. ...

Network connectivity is a single point of failure when it comes to user experience on the web. By nature of the web’s reliance on the network, the web fails when the network b0rks. Inadvertently as developers, this means that we’re always at the mercy of network connectivity. When faced with a slow or failed network connection, there is no way for us to help websites gracefully fail. While connectivity is an issue for most mobile web applications because of the reliance on the network, native mobile apps are able to deliver an offline user experience that is on par with an online one. This is largely because native mobile apps are built on the premise of “offline first”, where users are sent cached resources even before the app makes a connection to the server. ...

Last week, we identified the trend that a large and growing number of users are accessing the web via mobile devices. With this trend in mind, we covered various strategies to building websites that load fast and seamlessly without discriminating based on a user’s bandwidth and/or connectivity. From a performance standpoint, lightning fast websites translate to lower bounce rates and an overall more satisfactory user experience. In spite of this, however, the performance of a webpage, no matter how amazing, plays only a partial role when it comes to user engagement. According to a study done by Google comparing the top 1000 native mobile apps vs. top 1000 mobile web apps, it was discovered that while the mobile web saw close to 4 times the number of unique visitors than native apps, the time users spent on the mobile web was only 5% of the time spent on native apps (yikes!). ...

Content compression is one of the simplest and most effective means to improving webpage performance. A smaller file size means lighter page load and faster download speeds, which translates to lightning fast page renders. For some, if not most of us developers, content compression is a black box that we don’t have to give much though to. Compression mechanisms automagically work by default in browsers and servers. And if you’re loading pages via a CDN like Netlify, chances are you will never have to think about compression since they compress your files for you ✨ . Regardless, having a basic understanding of compression strategies can be a handy tool to add to your toolbox, especially in the event when you have to configure your own origin servers. ...

This week, we focused on web performance and discussed the many strategies to improving our websites to optimize for a fast user experience. Some of these strategies involved “forcing the browsers hand” or coercing it into downloading resources in a specified order and time—hello preload and async/defer. Historically, the browser exercised full control over how and when resources were downloaded in order to paint pixels to the screen. It would make requests as they came, one at a time and block rendering while it waited on resources it needed from the server. This was the norm under the HTTP/1.x protocol. With HTTP/2 however, the developer now has the capacity to influence the order and priority in which the browser loads content. In addition, we can now request multiple resources in parallel without the unnecessary overhead and complexity of establishing multiple connections (more in this later!). ...

In previous posts, we talked about optimizing our websites to reduce page weight and inadvertently decrease overall page load time. This page load metric, though incredibly important, doesn’t fully take into account the user’s perception of a websites’ performance. At the very least, a user’s goal when visiting a website is to view the page content. As a result, they are more likely attuned to the time it takes for a page to be viewable (first meaningful paint) or usable (time to interactive) rather than on the time it takes for the entire page to load (page load time). Optimizing for render performance requires a sound understanding of the steps the browser takes when going from initial page request to rendering pixels to the screen. ...